新規ご契約特典:年払いプランで 35% OFF · 料金を見る
言語を選択:
機能一覧 ソリューション 料金プラン 他社比較 リソース ログイン
BYO 配信アーキテクチャ

あなたの配信インフラ。あなたの完全な統制下で。

自社の配信サーバーを中央制御ハブに統合。設定したポリシーに基づくスマートルーティング、送信キューの保護、ドメインの常時最適化を実現します。

10〜100台以上のサーバー連携実績・性能ベースのルーティングベンダーロックインのリスクなし
Sending orchestration center
Infrastructure statusReady
Amazon SESDedicated quota and reputationActive
SendGridCampaign fallback routeReady
Gmail OAuthPersonal email from the teamConnected
運用上のボトルネック

メール配信を単一のパイプラインに依存させるべきではありません。

販促メール、トランザクション通知、個別営業メールが同一サーバーを通ると、一部の評判低下がブランド全体に波及します。

COST

Software fees grow with stored contacts

Budget is tied to database size rather than the email volume the business actually sends.

ROUTING

Traffic is distributed manually

Teams split campaigns themselves and monitor limits across several provider accounts.

INCIDENTS

No fallback route is ready

A restriction on one account can stop an entire campaign halfway through its queue.

OWNERSHIP

Switching becomes difficult

Reputation, configuration, and operating history are hard to carry forward from a closed platform.

4つの中核機能

Turn multiple sending accounts into one policy-driven system.

Each capability manages a different layer: connection, traffic allocation, queue continuity, and route-level observability.

CONNECT

Bring existing providers into one workspace

Manage Amazon SES, SendGrid, Mailgun, Gmail OAuth, and private SMTP from one inventory.

ROUTING

Set weights around campaign goals

Select routes by email type, available quota, audience, or an internal sending policy.

FALLBACK

Prepare an alternative before an incident

Monitor status so the team knows which route can take over the queue when needed.

OBSERVE

Compare performance route by route

Separate bounce, complaint, throughput, and connection errors by provider.

運用方法の比較

Move from separate provider accounts to a governable operating model.

The meaningful difference is the workflow change, not another list of feature checkmarks.

比較項目従来の方法eMailBase での運用

Infrastructure setup

Sign in and configure each tool separately.

Register every sending route in one controlled inventory.

Traffic allocation

Split lists and campaigns by hand.

Define routing policy before a campaign starts.

Incident response

Find another route after the queue has stopped.

Prepare fallback capacity and monitor readiness in advance.

Performance review

Reports remain isolated and hard to compare.

Compare provider, domain, and campaign signals together.

Provider changes

Workflow remains tied to a closed delivery platform.

Keep the data and automation layers while changing the sending route.

製品画面

Inspect every server before placing a campaign in the queue.

The Sending Servers screen shows the connection type and current status of each route. It explains infrastructure management directly instead of using an unrelated product screenshot.

Connection type for each route

Current sending limit

Status and latest update

Connected sending servers and their status in eMailBase
Sending routes and connection status in eMailBase.
追跡すべき指標

運用シグナルから改善を評価します。

Error rate by route

Track authentication, throttling, and availability errors for each provider.

Bounce and complaint signals

Compare list quality and sender reputation by sending domain.

Time to recovery

Measure the time from route failure detection until the queue resumes.

よくある質問

Questions to answer before connecting your own infrastructure.

Clarify the boundary between eMailBase orchestration and the sending provider.

No. You use an account with a provider such as Amazon SES or SendGrid; eMailBase supplies the management, routing, and automation layer above it.

Yes. You can organize separate routes and assign each one a purpose, such as transactional, marketing, or fallback delivery.

The switching policy must reflect your operating rules. eMailBase provides route status and orchestration controls to implement that policy.

Start with your current infrastructure

Centralize sending routes before scaling campaign volume.

Create a workspace, connect one provider, and validate the routing workflow with test data.