新客户特惠:按年支付立省 35% · 查看价格
选择语言:
功能特性 解决方案 价格方案 横向对比 资源中心 登录
AI Studio 与文案引擎

高转化文案,发信前经过严格进箱预检。

借助原生集成的 AI 能力生成吸睛标题、翻译 8 国地道文案,并在发送前全面扫描 Spam Score 风险,牢牢锁住收件箱。

每月 150 至 5,000 AI 积分发信前 Spam Score 全面诊断8 种主流语言地道翻译
Pre-send editorial workflow
DraftAI-assisted ideas
Review riskSpam Score and links
Approve and sendA human decides
运营瓶颈

盲猜标题与敏感词汇会严重拉低邮件打开率。

一个不经意的垃圾词汇或乏味的标题,足以摧毁团队耗费数月建立的良好域名信誉。

STARTING

Every campaign begins with a blank page

Time goes into the first draft instead of reviewing the message.

CONSISTENCY

Brand voice changes with every writer

The team lacks a shared brief, structure, and editorial rules.

RISK

Errors surface only after sending

Links, structure, and sensitive wording are not reviewed in advance.

ACCOUNTABILITY

AI becomes the final approver

Drafts are used without checking facts, brand context, or compliance.

四项核心能力

An editorial workflow with explicit control points.

AI creates options; marketers select, edit, and remain accountable; Spam Score adds a technical review signal.

BRIEF

Turn the objective into a structured draft

Use audience, goal, and tone as inputs instead of a generic prompt.

VARIATION

Create options for each segment

Adapt subject lines and calls to action to the recipient context.

PRE-FLIGHT

Review risk signals before sending

Check content, links, and structure so an editor can address potential issues.

APPROVAL

Keep a human approval step

Review facts, brand voice, and required terms before the email enters the queue.

运营方式对比

AI supports production; Spam Score supports review.

They solve different problems and should never be presented as a deliverability guarantee.

对比维度原有方式使用 eMailBase

First draft

Start from scratch for every campaign.

Generate a draft from an agreed brief and structure.

Variations

Duplicate and edit every version by hand.

Generate segment-specific options for editorial review.

Risk review

Rely on individual experience.

Use a consistent list of signals before sending.

Final decision

No shared approval step.

An accountable owner approves content and facts.

Deliverability

Attribute the result to one score.

Consider content alongside DNS, reputation, and data quality.

产品实景

Edit inside the actual product interface.

The Template Builder shows where the team edits content. AI suggestions and risk checks belong next to that workflow, not in an unrelated decorative image.

Draft inside the editor

Drag-and-drop content blocks

Review before saving or exporting

Email template editor in eMailBase
The content builder where users edit and approve an email draft.
建议监测的指标

用运营信号衡量改进成效。

Time to approved draft

Measure from receiving the brief until content is ready for the queue.

Pre-send issues found

Track links, variables, and content issues caught during pre-flight.

Results by variation

Compare engagement across versions sent to the same segment.

常见问题

Where should AI stop in the editorial process?

Use AI to expand options, not to replace editorial ownership or fact-checking.

No. It covers selected content signals; DNS, sender reputation, list quality, and engagement remain critical.

Always review facts, brand voice, legal requirements, and personalization variables before sending.

Provide a clear brief, preferred language, and editorial rules to produce options closer to your style.

Build review into the workflow

Write faster while keeping a responsible owner.

Try a real brief, create several options, and review them before using one in a campaign.