Every campaign begins with a blank page
Time goes into the first draft instead of reviewing the message.
AI Studio＆コピーエンジン
高成約コピーを、配信前に厳格に診断。
内蔵AIによる魅力的な件名作成、8言語の自然な多言語翻訳、スパムスコアの事前監査により、受信トレイへの確実な到達を支援。
毎月 150〜5,000 AIクレジット配信前のスパムスコア事前診断8言語対応の高精度ローカライズ
DraftAI-assisted ideas
Review riskSpam Score and links
Approve and sendA human decides
運用上のボトルネック
件名やワード選びの勘頼みは開封率の低下を招きます。
不用意なスパム判定ワードや退屈な件名は、数ヶ月かけて築き上げたドメイン評価を瞬時に損なう危険があります。
Brand voice changes with every writer
The team lacks a shared brief, structure, and editorial rules.
Errors surface only after sending
Links, structure, and sensitive wording are not reviewed in advance.
AI becomes the final approver
Drafts are used without checking facts, brand context, or compliance.
4つの中核機能
An editorial workflow with explicit control points.
AI creates options; marketers select, edit, and remain accountable; Spam Score adds a technical review signal.
BRIEF
Turn the objective into a structured draft
Use audience, goal, and tone as inputs instead of a generic prompt.
VARIATION
Create options for each segment
Adapt subject lines and calls to action to the recipient context.
PRE-FLIGHT
Review risk signals before sending
Check content, links, and structure so an editor can address potential issues.
APPROVAL
Keep a human approval step
Review facts, brand voice, and required terms before the email enters the queue.
運用方法の比較
AI supports production; Spam Score supports review.
They solve different problems and should never be presented as a deliverability guarantee.
比較項目従来の方法eMailBase での運用
First draft
Start from scratch for every campaign.
Generate a draft from an agreed brief and structure.
Variations
Duplicate and edit every version by hand.
Generate segment-specific options for editorial review.
Risk review
Rely on individual experience.
Use a consistent list of signals before sending.
Final decision
No shared approval step.
An accountable owner approves content and facts.
Deliverability
Attribute the result to one score.
Consider content alongside DNS, reputation, and data quality.
製品画面
Edit inside the actual product interface.
The Template Builder shows where the team edits content. AI suggestions and risk checks belong next to that workflow, not in an unrelated decorative image.
Draft inside the editor
Drag-and-drop content blocks
Review before saving or exporting
追跡すべき指標
運用シグナルから改善を評価します。
Measure from receiving the brief until content is ready for the queue.
Track links, variables, and content issues caught during pre-flight.
Compare engagement across versions sent to the same segment.
よくある質問
Where should AI stop in the editorial process?
Use AI to expand options, not to replace editorial ownership or fact-checking.
No. It covers selected content signals; DNS, sender reputation, list quality, and engagement remain critical.
Always review facts, brand voice, legal requirements, and personalization variables before sending.
Provide a clear brief, preferred language, and editorial rules to produce options closer to your style.
Build review into the workflow
Write faster while keeping a responsible owner.
Try a real brief, create several options, and review them before using one in a campaign.